Search for: "DOES 1-101"
Results 261 - 280
of 3,328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
The federal regulations provide that if a parent does not participate in the resolution session the district may request that the HO dismiss the complaint.IDEA, § 615 (f)(1)(B); 34 C.F.R. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:23 pm
If it does not - the individual is NOT required to register as a sex offender because the out of state conviction does not fall within the statutory requirements of sections 16-22-103(1)(b), 18-3-411(1), 18-3-412.5(1), and 18-7-302(1)(a). [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 5:00 pm
A charity does not have to file a notice of a charitable sales promotion with the secretary of state. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
Unidentified Parties - Does 1-20The Accused Infringers last sought dismissal of the 20 parties identified only as Does 1-20. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:10 am
Uninsured Motorist CoverageUninsured motorist coverage is a component of an auto insurance policy that provides coverage when an injured person is involved in an accident and (1) the at-fault driver does not have insurance; (2) the at-fault vehicle does not have insurance; (3) the at-fault driver flees the scene; (4) the at-fault vehicle was stolen. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm
R. 307(a)(1) “The following judgments and orders are appealable without the finding required for appeals… A custody or allocation of parental responsibilities judgment or modification of such judgment entered pursuant to the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/101 et seq.) or Illinois Parentage Act of 2015 (750 ILCS 46/101 et seq.). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:34 pm
§101 et seq. (2012). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:05 am
The Bill lists four particular eligibility exclusions that would be codified within a new Section 101(b)(1). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:04 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] Sound View Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
[1] See, e.g., H.R. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:59 am
Furthermore, we find the “computer” of claim 1 is invoked merely as a tool and does not provide any specific improvement in computer capabilities. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:16 am
I apologize for the formatting of the table, which for some reason does not turn out so nicely here.The Treaty of Lisbon entered into force on 1 December 2009 (“ToL”). [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
§ 702.10(1)(d), Fla. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
§ 702.10(1)(d), Fla. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
§ 702.10(1)(d), Fla. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 8:30 am
§ 34-10-101(a)(v), and a wild deed serving as a root of title that does not bear a defect “on its face” is not an “inherent defect” in the chain of record title under Wyo. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:53 am
For those of you who, like me, sat through Statistics 101 thinking that it would be great if there was a long needle within reach so I could stick it in my eye rather than have to sit through any more lectures, much of the discussion about the “1 in 5″ rape epidemic stat that has driven the hysteria upon which evisceration of basic due process rights are grounded is problematic. [read post]
18 May 2016, 10:00 pm
The proper procedure for a § 101 rejection has been clarified, so practitioners can expect more reasoned § 101 rejections and be able to more effectively respond to such rejections. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 2:10 am
… Thus, claim 1 does not involve the transformation of any physical object or substance, or an electronic signal representative of any physical object or substance. [read post]
