Search for: "Dare v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 724
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2016, 12:42 pm
  That applies as much in Marxist Leninist states (to which the essay is directed) as it does in theocratic states (the clerical elite) and Western states (the socio-economic-political elites). [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 1:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Even the Supreme Court prefers to treat Bush v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm by Giles Peaker
In this situation the Code states that the Secretary of State considers it is unlikely to be reasonable for a tenant to occupy the property beyond the date in the s.21 notice (1 July 2014). [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:10 pm
On Thursday, federal Judge Andrew Hanen in Brownsville, Texas filed an extraordinary order in the immigration case (Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
  The court relied only on some general language from Lance v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:00 am
 Using Words and Phrases (Thomson Reuters), we find that the court in State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
” Despite a walkout by Democrats in the state senate, which allowed the bill to pass 32-0 and give the appearance of no dissent, HB 2 was presented to the state’s governor, who signed it into law the very same day.As the title suggests, the bill is focused on (dare I say obsessed with?) [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
"  And thus we have an introduction to today’s case, Tersigni v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
   That was in the case of National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Geoffrey
  It is the State and its Courts that have authority to coerce a Party who has not complied with his bargain. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 1:01 am by INFORRM
The case I attended was listed as AM -v- UH and EO and TH 1281945401 – Where UH should live – HEARING IN PUBLIC. [read post]