Search for: "Dave Hoffman"
Results 261 - 280
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2006, 3:35 pm
I agree with Dave Hoffman that Nifong won't succeed on any First Amendment defenses. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:46 am
And if so, it should work in the other direction, with a video arguably favoring a defendant on a defense motion for summary judgment. 4) Dave Hoffman posts about the unique link among cultural cognition, summary judgment, and video and makes a great point that I just added to my paper: The unique problem of cultural dissensus in video cases is that more people will have seen (and, I would add, drawn conclusions about) video, meaning more people will be offended by a… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
I'll be presenting the sequel paper this Friday afternoon at the Canadian Law and Economics Association in Toronto (and I hope local Prawfs readers will get in touch with me there; I'll be hanging out with Dave Hoffman and Erik Knutsen). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:03 pm
This is just a version of the “unraveling of the market” that Dave Hoffman cited to explain why the spring cycle itself seemed to be creeping up earlier and earlier. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:48 am
Via Ilya Somin at Volokh Conspiracy: Both Dave Hoffman and Orin Kerr have recently suggested that some of the liberal legal commentators who claimed that the individual mandate was a slam dunk case for the government were doing so for the purposes of “shaping the narrative” about the case, and may not have actually believed what they said. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
And Hoffman is just laughing his butt off at me. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 9:48 pm
My guess is that both Dave Hoffman and my positions are being mischaracterized so that Dan can stake out a more reasonable or attractive middle position...in the service of humor and some larger point. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
McGhee (@Yvonne_McGhee) March 13, 2015 … which refers to this slide: A young Dustin Hoffman learns about mobile. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:05 pm
Here’s the question I posed on one of Dave Hoffman’s Scholastica threads over at CoOps: I’m curious if you have a position on using gender, race, and the like to select invitees for symposia, conferences, and similar speaking engagements. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 5:25 am
But Hoffman, with her middle-class background, was in some ways not a typical C.I. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
As Sharona Hoffman has argued, in the realm of treatment, there are important rationales for prioritizing the independent medical judgment of professionals whose first obligation is to maintain health:If patients are empowered to opt out of EHR use or to disallow treating physicians’ access to their records, they may lose much of the benefit of computerization. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Hansen, Eric Hansen, Merrill Hansen, Dave Harding, Celia Hardwick, Kevin Hardy, James T. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 10:16 pm
For more on the paternalism of law school, see Dave Hoffman's post on Concurring Opinions about compulsory attendance, which has an excellent comment thread.I will add now this now, after all of this extra school and graduate teaching:It is (usually, but perhaps less in law, although that may be changing with the increase in J.D. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:39 am
I’d planned to wait before blogging about it, but events have overtaken my plans since Orin Kerr and Dave Hoffman are already discussing my ideas over at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:13 am
In terms of proximity, Eric joins Orin Kerr and Dave Hoffman in noting that the physical proximity that motivates the SOS system is absent in cyberspace. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:21 pm
Since the begining of that race, I have given to Thompson, Hoffman, Rubio, Brown and last week, Cain. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm
[UPDATE: Dave Hoffman and Orin Kerr both question the significance of the factual findings. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:15 pm
Unfortunately, it can lead to unfortunate collective outcomes in so far as such beliefs influence election results and the content of public policy.UPDATE: I previously wrote about the relationship between rational ignorance and belief in political conspiracy theories here.UPDATE #2: Dave Hoffman of Concurring Opinions responds to this post here. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 4:21 am
As Dave Hoffman says, it’s integral to a consultant functioning. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm
For example, in his comments from a few months ago, Dave Hoffman was working under the assumption that to randomize client selection would not change an agency’s representation practices at all, and on that basis, he criticized resistance to randomized control trials as “trying to prevent research from happening. [read post]
