Search for: "David Bader"
Results 261 - 280
of 889
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
David J. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am
” Additional coverage comes from Bill Mears at Fox News, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, and Howard Fischer at Capitol Media Services (via the Arizona Capitol Times). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am
Four different justices – Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer – would have ruled that courts can review partisan-gerrymandering claims. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
The first part of the argument must have seemed promising to Eric Miller, counsel for the Lundgrens: Sitting at counsel table, he had the luxury, without saying a word, of listening to the justices hound David Hawkins (counsel for the tribe) with all of Miller’s best arguments. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Scalia is deified by the right and vilified by the left, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is viewed in the opposite way. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
By Geoffrey R. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:20 am
” In an op-ed for the Orlando Sentinel, David Keating and Thomas Wheatley weigh in on Lozman v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:15 am
Enter gadfly David Patchak, Michigan’s version of the irrepressible Florida litigant Fane Lozman (who coincidentally had his most recent case argued yesterday moments after the justices rejected Patchak’s claim). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
” Additional coverage comes from David Nakamura and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Pete Williams at NBC News, Lydia Wheeler and Rafael Bernal at The Hill, Stef Kight at Axios, Josh Gerstein and Ted Hesson at Politico, Jessica Gresko at the Associated Press, Alice Ollstein at Talking Points Memo, Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung at Reuters, Chris Geidner at BuzzFeed News, and Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal, who reports that “[t]he decision is likely to take… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
On the other side, David Frederick is representing AFSCME today, just as he represented the National Education Association and its affiliate two terms ago in Friedrichs v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
David C. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
Becerra and the Thomas dissent comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Richard Wolf for USA Today, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Ronn Blitzer at Law & Crime, David Sherfinski for The Washington Times, Lydia Wheeler at The Hill, and Pete Williams at NBC News. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that Janus v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 7:11 am
Compiled by the Society's publications director, Clare Cushman (who has authored several other works on Supreme Court history), this book also includes a foreword by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
For the Tribune News Service (via Governing), David Savage reports that in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” At National Review, David French worries that in an amicus brief in support of neither party in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:48 pm
It -- Congress has addressed this very question, twice, in 22 U.S.C. 2459 [the Immunity from Judicial Seizure Act], Congress provided a very specific and limited immunity for culturally significant objects being brought to the United -- culturally significant objects being brought to the United States for display or exhibition.There was a very specific immunity there that the -- that somebody wants to bring in -- in that property, those exhibits can apply to the State Department in advance and… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:35 pm
Instead, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suggested, Congress enacted Section 1610(g) to allow plaintiffs like the victims in this case to overcome the presumption that a judgment against a foreign state cannot be enforced against that state’s agencies and instrumentalities. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 5:36 pm
So it is hard to say what motivated the seven justices in the majority (Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
More Perfect (podcast) tells the story of how a “then-lawyer at the ACLU named Ruth Bader Ginsburg set out to convince an all-male Supreme Court to take sex discrimination seriously with an unconventional strategy. [read post]
