Search for: "Davis v. Doe" Results 261 - 280 of 3,809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Specified limit price:  This term is not defined in the proposed rule, and the proposal does not set any particular parameters for how the limit price is set. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm by Michael Douglas
The second ground, that Australia is an inappropriate forum, turns on application of the ‘clearly inappropriate forum’ test of the Australian forum non conveniens doctrine: Chandrasekaran v Navaratnem [2022] NSWSC 346, [5]–[8]; Sapphire Group Pty Ltd v Luxotico HK Ltd [2021] NSWSC 589, [77]–[80]; Studorp Ltd v Robinson [2012] NSWCA 382, [5], [62]. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with them, for harm caused by… [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:43 pm by Thomas James
Photographer Jeffrey Sedlik took a photograph of musician Miles Davis. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm by Bill Marler
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Here’s the opening of Justice O’Connor’s separate opinion in Davis v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Elaine Hou
Crane Why Does Congress Want to Break Amazon Prime? [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:25 am by CMS
Mr Davies QC for Mr and Mrs Brake submitted that they were invited to bid for the cottage and the process was unfair, unlawful and unconscionable. [read post]