Search for: "Davis v. Public Safety "
Results 261 - 280
of 385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
21 May 2008, 9:00 am
" Davis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
ANALYSIS In a forthcoming publication for the U.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:53 am
Less than a month later a Department of Public Safety officer visited Mr. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:25 am
As Justice Kennedy wrote in his Davis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
Sotomayor questioned whether lengthy detention could be appropriate without a finding that the immigrant was a flight risk or a danger to public safety. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:07 pm
Her defense lawyer, Boston public defender Benjamin H. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:20 pm
Cooper jokingly describes this hearing as Paulson v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
McKaig v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court wrote in Davis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Shortly after taking office, President Trump issued an Executive Order —entitled “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States”—that directs relevant cabinet officers to deprive sanctuary jurisdictions of federal funding. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS Factual Background On March 23, 1983, Lisa DeCarr and Kathy Stevens wereexpelled from school after they were discovered outside smoking under a tree. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The defendant sought summary judgement on the basis that there was no publication, or alternatively no substantial publication, of the words complained of. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
” http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-1227.pdf Davis v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:33 am
The Chamber v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
[E]ven if Plaintiff could show that "[m]ore could have been done or said," the Defendants did not display indifference toward the public's safety and therefore punitive damages are not warranted. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Davis, No. 07-1964 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although a vehicular safety statute involving dangling ornaments that police relied upon to make the stop at issue was unconstitutionally vague; 2) nevertheless, the exclusionary rule did not apply as police were relying in good faith on a presumptively valid statute. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 3:55 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 9 Cal.3d 51, 64 (1973). [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
The commonwealth has long prohibited uranium mining, allegedly motivated by concerns about the radiological safety of uranium milling and tailings-management activities. [read post]
