Search for: "Davis v. Public Safety "
Results 261 - 280
of 385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 11:19 am
” Finally, in another case in the public employment context, Vergos v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
[E]ven if Plaintiff could show that "[m]ore could have been done or said," the Defendants did not display indifference toward the public's safety and therefore punitive damages are not warranted. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:52 am
People v McLoyd, 2012 N.Y. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am
It also rejected the question of Article 10 rights arising as the right is qualified to the extent that is “necessary … in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety”. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:40 am
But even Hardesty says "raw milk is a different question," presumably because of serious concerns about its safety. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:24 pm
Structural Inequality (law, public health, education, other) Conscious and Unconscious Animus Against Poor People (immigration, criminalization, family, other) Spatial Inequality (segregation, rurality, surveillance) W(h)ither the Social Safety Net? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
See Davies v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
See Davies v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:24 pm
Supreme Court’s March 2009 decision in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:08 am
Structural Inequality (law, public health, education, other) Conscious and Unconscious Animus Against Poor People (immigration, criminalization, family, other) Spatial Inequality (segregation, rurality, surveillance) W(h)ither the Social Safety Net? [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
The aim of the theory is to put limits on Congress’s power to spend money on public programs. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:54 am
See Handschu v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
A report prepared for the New Zealand Food Safety Authority (NZFSA). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Senate v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
” The two key prior decisions, aside from Crawford itself, were those in Davis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
App. 1981) (the “fact [the prescriber] failed to read the package inserts and PDR negates any possible negligence on the part of [the manufacturer] in not emphasizing the hazards in those publications”); Cronin v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:29 am
The Court created an additional “safety valve” of actually innocence as well. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 1:08 pm
In balancing the interests of public safety against the rights of individual drivers, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld in Heddan v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 1:08 pm
In balancing the interests of public safety against the rights of individual drivers, the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld in Heddan v. [read post]
