Search for: "Deal v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 29,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Switzerland case concerned a group of older Swiss women; the territorially and substantively ambitious Duarte Agostinho v. 32 Member States was brought by six Portuguese children and young people; and Carême v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Sutton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
Folks who’ve been following this blog for years know that periodically I like to venture beyond New York’s borders to find and report on interesting decisions from other states in business divorce cases. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Hall notes that under the test Justice Gorsuch articulates in his Gundy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
I am very familiar with this limbo, as the Defense Distributed case is stuck somewhere between the Garden State and the Lone Star State. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 8:05 am
Parker and Kelo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:16 am
Greene v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 12:15 am
A great deal of attention, including in this blog, has been focused Delaware reincorporating in Nevada and other states. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm
The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
New Section 261(a)(1) is being added in light of Crispo v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:52 pm
Hanrahan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:03 pm
For example, it suggests that United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:21 am
Carême v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am
The 1997 PDRS was in use, and it specifically stated that its MDT was intended as a guide only. [read post]