Search for: "Delaware v. New York" Results 261 - 280 of 1,826
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am by Shari Shapiro
   Last week, the states of New York, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Maine, State of New Mexico, State of Oregon, State of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Washington, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia filed notice of their intention to participate as amicus curiae  In June, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, West Virginia, Alaska, Nebraska, Ohio and Wyoming also filed an… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  In addition to those mentioned, the Business Roundtable/ Chamber's brief indicated that the following had filed a notice to participate as amicus: Council of Institutional Investors, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, California State Teachers’ Retirement System, State of Wisconsin Investment Board, Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, Oregon State Treasurer Ted Wheeler, New York City Employees’… [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:26 am by Ettinger Law Firm
  NEW YORK LONG ESTABLISHED PROTECTIONS AGAINST CREDITORS As with each of the 15 states, the protections afforded under New York law has its limitations. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Sherwood also examined the right to inspect LLC books and records under New York law as to one of the managing LLCs whose operating agreement includes a New York choice-of-law provision. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:15 am
Aug. 27, 2010), the Supreme Court of Delaware answered a certified question of Delaware law from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the standing of a plaintiff-shareholder of a parent corporation to bring a “double derivative” action following a merger. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Lampers had originally filed a separate derivative action in federal court in New York but that complaint was provisionally dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 23.1. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:28 am by Benjamin D. Tievsky
In In re Viking Pump, Inc., New York’s Court of Appeals did not overrule its 2002 decision in Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. [read post]