Search for: "Department of State v. Ray" Results 261 - 280 of 420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 6:40 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
" A California Dept. of Agriculture spokesperson said the Department would be guided by the state legislature. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Other state Attorneys General are contemplating a national roll out of the Act. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:30 am by Ray Dowd
Breaking news here.Perhaps most significant was the US Supreme Court's decision in Golan v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:22 pm by Kevin
Department of Wildlife & Fishery, State of Louisiana, Case No. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm by Orin Kerr
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
It was Corzine's stated goal to transform MF Global from a commodity broker into an investment bank with a large proprietary trading operation similar to the one Corzine ran at Goldman in the 1990s. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]