Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 6:34 am
ELI itself suffered damage from this—its diminished ability to protect its interest in the marks in this very suit and Kunze’s post-sale attempt to register the marks on his own behalf—but the purchasers didn’t establish damage in their own rights. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:00 am
Defendants argued that plaintiffs had to find a purchaser of each of the 42 separate Folgers products using the allegedly misleading label. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:26 am
The conduct that the plaintiffs sue over - the sham litigation - didn't involve any contact between the defendant and the plaintiff third party payers. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:53 am
Feldstein, 20 A.D.3d 469, 470, 799 N.Y.S.2d 104 (2d Dep't 2005) (failure to disclose third party offer for LLC prior to Defendant member's purchase of Plaintiff's shares). [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am
Mar. 30, 2017)The parties compete in the market for in-car video and surveillance systems (which makes the court’s conclusion below that they’re not competitors a bit odd—the court really seemed annoyed with the plaintiff’s arguments, which may have led it to stampede its conclusions). [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:17 am
In evaluating a motion for stay pending appeal we consider four factors: "(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
While the plaintiff was the less monied spouse, the court’s award reflected consideration of the relevant factors, including that the plaintiff’s conduct resulted in unnecessary litigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:25 pm
A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:53 am
AT&T Services is a consumer of Boykin’s products, or an interested third party, and Wong was just an “employee attempting to influence the decisions of his employer and others in the industry to use a specific product. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
Had the defendants been sued by direct or indirect purchasers, however, there might have been a different result. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Unlike in the 1920s, large numbers of Americans today are "investors" - as purchasers (i.e. shareholders) of individual stocks, mutual funds, etc. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
In one direction (emphasised by the SCC) it may be said that a worldwide medium requires a worldwide remedy if it is to be effective. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
In one direction (emphasised by the SCC) it may be said that a worldwide medium requires a worldwide remedy if it is to be effective. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:55 am
DIXIE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee. 4th District.Contracts -- Profit participation agreements -- Dispute arising out of agreements whereby parties purchased commercial shopping center properties and subsequently entered into preliminary profit participation agreements to establish rights and responsibilities for the completion of the purchase, and post-closing profit participation agreements which provided that each participant would receive… [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 6:08 am
(Canada also has a standalone foreign-directed conspiracy provision.) [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:48 pm
The second transaction involved the Partnership’s purchase of the remaining 49% interest in Southern LNG and Elba Express, plus the purchase of a 15% interest in Southern Natural Gas Company. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 10:57 am
The finding of no willfulness was also reasonable, given that even Evoqua’s own sales reps thought that Evoqua was abandoning the business and directed customers interested in a J-Mate sludge dryer to Watermark. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:15 pm
Reversed and remanded with directions. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 9:01 am
The parties settled for more than $4 million. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:51 am
In 2000, plaintiffs purchased a house built in 1964 that had a fireplace, which plaintiffs had remodeled by a third party. [read post]
