Search for: "Dodd v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2014, 6:28 am
"There is absolutely nothing in the [statute], or in the legislative history of the Dodd-Frank Act, that suggests that Congress intended the antiretaliation provision to regulate the relationships between foreign employers and their foreign employees working outside the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am
Supreme Court held in Fifth Third Bank v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
See Gupta v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
This action is called a Dodd removal, in tribute to the State Senator who penned the authorizing legislation. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 8:51 am
What is not obvious to all is whether the United States Supreme Court will agree that anyone can be forced to abide by such restrictions consistent with the First Amendment. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 1:08 pm
In a one-two punch illustrating the continuing vigor of the presumption against extraterritoriality, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on consecutive days last week, issued important decisions applying Morrison v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:22 am
The Second Circuit’s decision clearly will have an impact on prospective whistleblowers outside the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court in the 2010 case of Morrison v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
The United States’ court system has a clear hierarchy, and lower courts are obliged to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
§ 78u-6(h)(1)(a), apply to an employee who is terminated by a non-U.S. corporation that does business in (and is regulated by) the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:36 am
Just in time for the SEC’s 80th birthday (tomorrow is 80 years since the ’34 Act was signed into law), comes this news from Paul Weiss (we will be posting memos in our “SEC Enforcement” Practice Area): Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a significant decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:09 am
United States, may impact the analysis in this case. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
On March 4, 2014, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided its first case under Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower protection provision, Section 806. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
• Kara Brockmeyer, head of the FCPA Unit in the Division of Enforcement, stated that the unit is off to a fast start in 2014. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Bobby looked at the recent preliminary determination by the Karzai administration to release 88 detainees without prosecution and against strong protests from the United States. [read post]
