Search for: "Doe Governmental Agencies 1-10"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
1. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:34 am
If a governmental agency or a public officer is a party to the settlement agreement, such a provision cannot be requested. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
[O]n August 1, 2008, the DUI drug charge was dismissed as the urine test for drugs was negative. . . [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
” Id.As discussed in more detail in the FDA Law Blog post, Whitman was not an FDCA case at all but rather a Rule 10-b-5 criminal prosecution by the Securities & Exchange Commission. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:21 pm
What is a “Targeted Employment Area” and what does it mean for an investor? [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
§ 1581(a),[1] derived from a statute passed by the First Congress, the Act of Aug. 4, 1790, ch. 35, § 31, 1 Stat. 164, see United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
This case includes the following issue: Does a state agency that may have an obligation to make “fair-share” payments for the mitigation of off-site impacts of a proposed project satisfy its duty to mitigate under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:54 am
See Israel v Wood Dolson Co., 1 NY2d 116 (1956); see also John J. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 10:28 am
Friday, October 23, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.: CSIS will host a live webcast about how COVID-19 has exacerbated poverty and economic inequality worldwide. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
Subsection A, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of this section shall not apply to: 1. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
Another odd governmental fact is that the FDA does not seem to make a distinction between pathogens it considers adulterants or not. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
These myths establish the paradigms for behavior.[2] 1. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
In summary, the case makes clear that, to be protected from retaliation, an employee must make a complaint to management (or a governmental agency) that: 1. identifies past conduct; 2. relates to fraud on shareholders (this is the key - it does not protect employees who complain about, say, tax fraud); 3. alleges that management had a fraudulent intent. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
While the exact phrasing of course varies, the general intent of these exceptions is to immunize from liability under consumer protection statutes conduct that is taken in compliance with governmental oversight. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:18 am
Wednesday, May 15 at 10:00 a.m.: CSIS will host Vice Adm. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
(b)1. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:57 pm
Target, 243 F.R.D. 301, 308 (2007). [8] See generally In Re Qwest Communications International, Inc. 450 F.3d 1179 (2006). [9] Id. [10] 572 F2D 596 [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:59 am
Another odd governmental fact is that the FDA does not seem to make a distinction between pathogens it considers adulterants or not. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:25 pm
Another odd governmental fact is that the FDA does not seem to make a distinction between pathogens it considers adulterants or not. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:34 pm
Usually, OMB does not receive any public comments at all, and in these cases it is OMB is compelled by necessity to assume that what the agency provided is valid and reliable. [read post]
