Search for: "Doe PL" Results 261 - 280 of 931
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2017, 2:56 am by Jeremy Saland
If the District Attorney does push back, then a judge would be required to commence a hearing prior to rendering a decision. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:58 am by Jeremy Saland
While this blog does not address the merits of the law, the question posed here is can you apply to have your conviction for NY PL 265.01 sealed with the passage of CPL 160.59 and is Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon an eligible offense? [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
See earlier post on Lucinda Vine and Kristy Pond v PLS Financial Services, Inc. and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Inc., No. 16-50847 (5th Cir. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 6:43 am by Jeremy Saland
Both Fifth Degree Criminal Possession of Marihuana, NY PL 221.10, and Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of Marihuana, NY PL 221.15, are misdemeanor crimes. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 6:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
Patent Law Amendment Act of 1852 [PL Amendment Act (1852)]. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:24 pm by Marie-Andree Weiss
However, the Cour de cassation en banc (Assemblée Plénière) held on May 7, 2004, that “the owner of a good does not have an exclusive right over its image”. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 2:32 am by Jeremy Saland
For example, if you had a conviction for Petit Larceny, PL 155.25, from 2003 and you were now arrested for possessing a gravity knife in violation of Fourth Degree Criminal Possession of a Weapon, PL 265.01, prosecutors could still use your past conviction to enhance your current conviction as permitted by law. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
CAVEAT FOR READERS IN TEXAS: This action by targets of National Collegiate Student Loan collection suits was filed in a different state and in a different circuit, and involves state law claim in addition to federal FDCPA claims, and unfair collection claims under the FDCPA heavily implicated state law which varies among states. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
B, at 16.The language in the contracts indicates that Plaintiff may recover attorney's fees incurred in pursuing its claims, insofar as such recovery does not violate the Texas Constitution. [read post]