Search for: "Doe v. County of Suffolk"
Results 261 - 280
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2010, 4:14 pm
Berger, 88 Misc. 2d 487 (1976), where the Suffolk County Supreme Court held that leaving a one and a two year old alone for a half hour at night did not amount to maltreatment under the Family Court Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:49 am
County of Suffolk, decided on June 4. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:05 am
Agreeing to submit to random testing for unlawful drugsGluck v Suffolk County Community College, Supreme Court, Ia Part 26, received January 4, 2002 [Not selected for inclusion in the Official Reports]Joshua Gluck was terminated from his position of laborer by the Suffolk Community College [SCCC]. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:14 am
Plaintiffs are defendants in Onondaga, Ontario, Schuyler, Suffolk and Washington counties who have encountered these problems. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
, 31 Suffolk U. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:37 am
Requesting the reconsideration of an administrative determination does not toll the statute of limitations for bring an Article 78 actionMatter of Barresi v County of Suffolk, 2010 NY Slip Op 03439, Decided on April 27, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentPhilip R. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:43 am
" County of Suffolk v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:27 am
In Suffolk County v SCCC Faculty Association, the Appellate Division pointed out that if a party participates in an arbitration when "it did not have to," it cannot later seek to vacate the arbitration award "because it was not required to submit to the arbitration of the issue. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:15 pm
In Shaw v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:16 pm
Div., 2nd Dept., 283 A.D.2d 475Certain employees of the Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA) also maintained private businesses that offered plumbing services to homeowners. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
" Further, said the court, an attorney who advises a client to take an action that he or she, in good faith, believes to be legal, does not lose the protection of the First Amendment if his or her advice is later determined to be incorrect.The Appellate Division granted the appeal, prohibiting the Suffolk County District Attorney, Thomas J. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
Ct., Suffolk Co., decided 12/23/2009) Elrac, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:51 am
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:46 am
Pelszynski out of Suffolk County Supreme was the first; here's the second. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Austin (pictured) who was appointed to the appellate bench in 2009 after serving ten years as trial judge in the Commercial Division of the Nassau County Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:29 pm
"); and Grinshpun v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:20 am
The case went to a hearing in SDHR, and she lost, so she appealed to State Supreme Court in Suffolk County, which dismissed the case because Hanrahan did not name SDHR as a defendant to the petition. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:30 am
County of Suffolk, 2009 WL 4546671 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
Comprising six separate parts, A through F, the bill is self-described as: AN ACT to amend the insurance law, in relation to municipal cooperative health benefit plans, a study of community rating and the provision of claims experience to a municipality (Part A); to amend the general municipal law and the highway law, in relation to mutual aid (Part B); to amend the public health law, in relation to the composition of county and part-county boards of health (Part C); to amend the… [read post]
