Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California"
Results 261 - 280
of 320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
The Regents of the University of California (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 227: The EIR for projects located within the southeast quadrant of the U.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:10 am
The ‘912 Patent is assigned to the Regents of the University of California and relates to methods of enhancing mitochondrial metabolism without a concomitant increase in metabolic production of oxygen reactive species, using specific doses of a combination of carnitine, together with lipoic acid (or N-acetyl-cysteine.). [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 10:38 pm
Regents of University of California, 143 F.3d 1446 (Fed. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm
Regents of the University of California, along with the National Immigration Law Center, the ACLU of Northern California, the ACLU of Southern California and the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
But not everyone does. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
Regents of The University of California (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 1043 is instructive. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
SEB S.A (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Filewrapper) BPAI decision in Ex parte Regents of the University of California – What to do with an interfering patent in patent reexamination (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisconsin: Product capable of infringing use did not infringe absent proof of specific instances of such use: PrivaCash, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 12:42 pm
Lawyers defending Martinez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 3:00 pm
Regents of University of California (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 160, 166-167, 95 Cal.Rptr.2d 10 [holding public employee not entitled to overtime provisions in IWC Order No. 4].) [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Board of Regents,[4] a case decided before New York law expressly prohibited fee-splitting. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are NOT punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
Regents of University of California (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 160; Garrett v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:53 pm
For instance, in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
The Regents of the University of California (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 818: The court upheld the EIR for a Long Range Development Plan for Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory against the challenge that its range of alternatives was insufficient, in part because it did not include an off-site alternative. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
United Airlines (7th Cir. 1971); Regents of University of California v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:51 am
Regents of University of California (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 977. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:10 am
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are not punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:38 am
s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The Supreme Court first recognized diversity in higher education as a "compelling" state interest in the 1978 ruling Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 8:52 am
Even for its supposed beneficiaries, affirmative action probably does more harm than good. [read post]
