Search for: "Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc" Results 261 - 280 of 594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
The Third Circuit rejected plaintiffs’ arguments that the district court abused its discretion by overstepping its authority in declining to certify a settlement class and in misapplying Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 6:21 am
The Third Circuit rejected plaintiffs’ arguments that the district court abused its discretion by overstepping its authority in declining to certify a settlement class and in misapplying Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 3:56 am by Lorene Park
The ADA does not require an employer to place an employee on permanent light duty or give other workers an employee’s assignments to accommodate a physical impairment (Josey v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
It does not however, change the requirement that Title VII claimants must identify and challenge discrete pay decisions. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The case is Heimeshoff v Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Dkt No 12-729) In an unpublished opinion, the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court’s decision that the plaintiff’s claim for long-term disability benefits was untimely because she filed her action outside the policy-prescribed, three-year statute of limitations period. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Greg Mersol
 The Supreme Court emphasized that requirement only two years ago in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Greg Mersol
Although the court started its analysis with the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:04 am by Andrew Trask
Between preliminary and final approval, however, the Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:28 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Additionally, the decision, known as “Whirlpool II”, represents some pushback with respect to another relatively recent Supreme Court decision thought to spell trouble for the future of class actions, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:04 am by John L. Welch
Opposer sells to Safeway, Wal-Mart, and Costco; applicant's witness testified that  it intends to sell its water in supermarkets.The fact that the goods will be sold in the same large store does not necessarily support a Section 2(d) claim, but here there was testimony that both water and wine are sold at wineries, and further Mr. [read post]