Search for: "Doe v. a CORP" Results 261 - 280 of 16,158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:48 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[AIU Insurance Co and Others v McKesson Corp., case no 22/16158 in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (January 26, 2024)] [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Dennis Crouch
United Therapeutics Corp., 23-804 (US), on petition for writ of certiorari from United Therapeutics Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am by Beatrice Yahia
“The Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists’ report of an alleged successful attack on M/V Ocean Jazz is patently false,” the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
ENDNOTES [1] Jeffrey Cohen, The 10b5-1 Plan: What Executives Need to Know, CORP. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
For example, CAS 403 addresses the allocation of home office costs to business segments,[23] and CAS 410 governs the allocation of business unit G&A to final cost objectives.[24] CAS 418, the focus here, applies to the extent any other provision of the CAS does not require a different allocation.[25] The purpose of CAS 418 is to provide criteria for “the consistent determination of direct and indirect costs,” “the accumulation of indirect costs … in indirect… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:38 am by Unknown
Justices explored whether Item 303 omissions require a misleading statement and if private rights of action are authorized in this context (Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
In other words, the Department of Commerce does not have the sort of rulemaking power that the EPA was given in the Clean Air Act and that was expressly exercised in writing the regulations sustained in Chevron. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007] [citations omitted]; see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50 [2015]). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
During the close-to-close trading sessions affected by a short report, defendant issuers’ stock price declined by 16.8%, on average, and incurred additional declines of 16.0% during the 90-day look-back period of Section 21D(e)(1) of the Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act.[3][4] Third, Rule 10b-5 private securities fraud lawsuits based primarily on activist short-seller research may not be indicative of actual fraud-on-the-market since the work product does not… [read post]