Search for: "Does, 1-4 Unidentified Does" Results 261 - 280 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2010, 9:31 am by Listeria Attorney
FDA investigators also observed the following significant violations of the seafood HACCP regulation and the Current Good Manufacturing Practice regulation for foods [21 CFR §§ 123 and 110]: 1) You must implement the monitoring procedures and frequency that you have listed in your HACCP plan to comply with 21 CFR §§ 123.6(b) and (c)(4). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:31 am by velvel
No. 95-763, at 1 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 764, 764. [read post]
Chancellor Chandler made it quite clear that Delaware law simply does not support this distinction. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 22, 2010 Doe-2 v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 22, 2010 Doe-2 v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:17 am by John Day
The Nevada Supreme Court has ruled that a pharmacy does not owe a duty of care to unidentified third parties who were injured by a pharmacy customer who was driving while under the influence of controlled prescription drugs. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
There were really only two options here: either, the track really was intended as a quotation from 4’33” or some other unidentified Cage work, in which case mechanical royalties were due; or, he was misappropriating Cage’s name in the context of a musical work, and that also would not do. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:49 pm
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You were still working in Tahoe, though, when he approached. [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:14 am
"  In fact, the Judge went on to explain that (1) the Feds improperly rely on speculative, uncertain, and unidentified "habitat improvement actions," (2) Fed scientists have concluded that many of the measures are unsupported by scientific literature; (3) the Feds         assign implausible and arbitrary numerical survival improvements to the tributary habitat actions, (4) the BiOp does not… [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:32 am
In December 2005 a Marshall jury found for plaintiff Paice in its case against Toyota and awarded approximately $4 million (I was there for closing arguments and recall the plaintiff asking for around $32 million, for what that's worth). [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:09 am
Banuelos said: Yes it does, but it also allows representative actions. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 3:23 pm
  Why does the media think they have to know everything about the case. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
This new requirement does not apply to excess liability or umbrella policies, whether personal or commercial lines in nature. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
Corp., Ltd., of Perth, Scotland, 238 Ky. 348, 38 S.W.2d 1 (Ky. 1931). [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
Rosado, 450 Mass. at 659- 660, quoting from St.1999, c. 74, § 1. [read post]