Search for: "Does 1 to 20"
Results 261 - 280
of 28,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2016, 1:00 am
, preLaw, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2016, at 26: [T]he vast majority of law schools discount their tuition through scholarships, some as much as 50 percent. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:21 pm
Interestingly IRS Publication 1779, which is only two pages does not specifically mention the 20 factor test set forth in IRS Revenue Ruling 87-41, 1987-1 C.B. 296. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 7:48 pm
., Oct. 20, 2020, No. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
County Of Santa Clara; Ferrara Enterprises LLC; Does;No. 1-08-CV-108597 (filed March 20, 2008) Premises liability lawsuit. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:42 am
ec. 20. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:42 am
ec. 20. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 2:30 am
In its factum, the OBA does not comment on the merits of the individual appeals but does address the following issues: 1. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:06 am
Item 1: Internet is unavoidable; we depend on digital systems; dependence does not imply access; Item 3: Philanthropy and tech for good programs have encouraged nonprofits to use whatever costs the least money, which means greater cost in terms of agency.]Natural Capital Coalition: . [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:27 am
”[6] Continue reading → The post What is the “trial penalty” in federal criminal cases and does it mean I shouldn’t take my case to trial? [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:12 am
Under a new California law effective January 1, 2009. it is now illegal write, send, or read a "text-based communication" while driving. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
Does that make sense? [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
Private sector and non-profit organizations with 20-49 employees no longer need to document policies (does not remove compliance or reporting requirements). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:35 pm
Twenty questions:1) Why aren't court documents scanned so they can be accessed electronically? [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
., No. 1:20-CV-00449 (M.D. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:14 am
§ 20-1-119. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
Subdivision (a)(1). [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
Subdivision (a)(1). [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
These are not all the issues involved, but if you cover all of them you will avoid a good deal of agina later on. 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:25 am
CONST. art. 1, § 27. [read post]
3d Cir.: Employer Must Pay for All Breaks Shorter Than 20 Minutes Notwithstanding “Flex Time” Policy
20 Oct 2017, 3:43 am
On appeal, the defendant-employer raised three arguments: (1) that time spent logged off under its flexible break policy categorically does not constitute work; (2) that the District Court erred in finding that WHD’s interpretive regulation on breaks less than twenty minutes long, 29 C.F.R § 785.18, is entitled to substantial deference; and (3) that the District Court erred in adopting the bright-line rule embodied in 29 C.F.R. [read post]
