Search for: "Does 1 to 50 "
Results 261 - 280
of 14,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 5:33 am
Maybe not, but, again, this case does not answer that precise question.] [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 9:44 am
An additional $1 billion will come from the private sector for a total of $1.6 billion in Smart Grid projects nationally. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 7:37 am
In so ruling, the court noted: a. the government would be unduly prejudiced without a forced sale, since a partial sale is not viable; b. the prejudice to Derek is minimal since he does not live on the premises and will receive 50% of the sale proceeds - further Derek could bid on the sale to either buy the full property himself or attempt to bid up the ultimate purchase price; and c. as a 50/50 ownership split, the relative ownership considerations weighed in… [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:21 am
The EEOC deems employers who failed to submit required EEO-1 reports on time as “out of compliance” and does not permit submission of any such late reports after-the-fact or during the subsequent reporting cycle. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:51 pm
Against All Defendants and DOES 1-50) 25. [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
However, the disclaimer of claim 1 does not exclude the polypeptides the sequence of which has at least 50% similarity with the sequence of 424 amino acids of figure 1 of document D1 or with any part of this sequence and which are capable of binding to IL-13 with low affinity. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:38 am
USCIS has issued new policy guidance on L-1 intracompany transfer petitions addressing sole proprietorships and Blanket L petitions. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 1:29 am
But merely because the lawsuits have been authorized does not necessarily mean we will see 50 lawsuits, as it appears that the FDIC approval was calculated in part to encourage pre-litigation settlements. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
Unlike Michigan, Minnesota does not cap attorney fees at one-third of the amount by which the ultimate award exceeds the good faith offer. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:25 pm
But what impact does a 1% increase in return have during the distribution phase. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:06 am
New Hampshire does much better on economic than personal freedom and on fiscal than regulatory policy. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:46 am
This is the #1 question I field and also one of the most challenging to answer. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:54 am
”So, what does this mean, especially for insurance agents? [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:03 am
”So, what does this mean, especially for insurance agents? [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:54 am
”So, what does this mean, especially for insurance agents? [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:07 am
Does this Kat think of Scotch Whisky? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:28 am
Whilst any increase will be welcome to the trade and event organisers, the extra 3 offers only a small benefit, and it should not be forgotten that there was no change to the other limits, so anyone who holds a personal licence is still subject to a maximum of 50 in a calendar year wherever the event will be held, and anyone who applies who does not hold a personal licence is limited to just 5 per calendar year. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:09 am
Ct. 658, 50 L. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 11:29 am
At least that will be the law in California starting July 1, 2008. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:51 am
Ct. 370, 50 L. [read post]
