Search for: "Downloader 99"
Results 261 - 280
of 866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 3:02 pm
You can download Jani's dissertation here. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
On Class 99 Hossain Badamchi gifts the blog with a story of how Lindt saved its packaging from a predatory design registrant in Iran by dint of its earlier trade mark registration, while blog founder David Musker muses on the problems of downloading Community design registration certificates. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
It made digital copies available for its Library Project partners to download for any uses that did not violate copyright laws. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Consequently, the opposition is admissible.The Board then remitted the case for further prosecution.Should you wish to download the whole decision, click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
”The same wording was used in decisions G 4/93 [5] and G 1/99 [6.1].It is thus clear that the appeal proceedings aim at contesting a decision.[2.2.3] In decision G 1/99 [6.1] the EBA further pointed out that: “Indeed, issues outside the subject-matter of the decision under appeal are not part of the appeal. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In that case, ALLofMP3 allowed users to download music albums for less than a dollar, providing some stiff competition for iTunes, which costs 99 cents per song. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 1:04 am
This book may be downloaded in PDF format, on the SiNApSE home page at www.sinapseblog.com. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:12 pm
Kino.to was an online platform – which closed its operations in June 2011 – where users could download or view in streaming movies without the consent of rightsholders. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:42 pm
But for 99 clams, 23andme delivers the essential and allows some speculative tweaking to see alternate results. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Podbielski, in: Singer/Stauder, EPÜ, 6th edition, A 99, marginal number 87, which cites further authorities). [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board is of the opinion that a remittal to the first instance for a fresh assessment of the admissibility of the opposition would only be justified if the criteria for assessing the substantiation of an opposition were different under the revised EPC as compared to the EPC 1973.[7] Pursuant to A 99(1), first sentence, EPC 1973 the opposition has to be substantiated within the time limit for filing an opposition. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thereby, said statement gave detailed reasons why the decision under appeal should be set aside and indicated the facts and evidence in support of the respective arguments.R 99(2) does not exclude that such evidence is submitted for the first time in appeal proceedings nor does it require that this evidence is admitted into the proceedings (see T 389/95 [1,3]).Therefore, the fact that the [opponent] relied inter alia on documents D6 to D13 in its statement setting out the grounds for appeal… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:45 am
In the case of TubePlus, it also provides access to downloads. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
Posts on the figures for trade marks and designs will appear on the Class 46 and Class 99 weblogs a later this week. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
New Mexico 2013http://t.co/swjg5N7hXD -> IBM charges Twitter with patent infringement | Internet & Media http://t.co/SE9aXS2ikX -> Philip Pullman: illegal downloading is ‘moral squalor’ http://t.co/r5Kuycugk7 -> The CopyKat – a global feast of copyright news http://t.co/pfucKtZPgW -> WIPO study analyzes legal issues regarding copyright on video games http://t.co/Y5OP0rvgXm -> Czech Supreme Court: Embedding is communication to the public… [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
This invitation does not appear to be helpful in view of the fact that the appellant, by then, had filed independent claims which – as acknowledged by the ED – were already distinguished from the prior art by two, if not three, different features.[13.3] In view of the above and with respect to the applicant’s request dated 3 December 2009 to exclude the primary examiner from the further proceedings the Board wishes to make reference to decision T 71/99. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
The rule states:“If the Board of Appeal notes that the appeal does not comply with R 99, paragraph 1(a), it shall communicate this to the appellant and shall invite him to remedy the deficiencies noted within a period to be specified. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
The board concurs with the view expressed in T 1019/99 [3.3] according to which “the correct procedure for formulating the problem is to choose a problem based on the technical effect of exactly those features distinguishing the claim from the prior art that is as specific as possible without containing elements or pointers to the solution”. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 398-99 (1987). [read post]
