Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont"
Results 261 - 280
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Cutlery and More, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 2:38 am
Anthropologie, Inc. and Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 3:30 am
Emminence, LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 1:29 pm
The court found that this evidence “strongly favors a finding of likelihood of confusion with respect to the du Pont factor regarding the relatedness of the goods. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
McDonald’s Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1973), Federated Foods, Inc. v Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d 1098, 1103 (C.C.P.A. 1976) and TMEP § 1207.01. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1973). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
" Zillow, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:15 am
And so the Board concluded that applicant "has not demonstrated that the 6th du Pont factor [the strength of the mark] should weigh in its favor. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 4:53 pm
Evidence of third-party use falls under the sixth factor of the du Pont factor analysis. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:55 am
As to the Section 2(d) issue, the Board found that the first du Pont factor, the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks, weighed against Stoncor. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Harry Winston, Inc. and Harry Winston S.A. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
” The TTAB lastly reviewed last the first du Pont factor, the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks, and found the marks to be similar, taking into account that it had found HARRY WINSTON to be a famous mark under the fifth du Pont factor. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:48 am
FUJIFILM SonoSite, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 1:16 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:06 am
I. du Pont Nemours & Co., one of Delaware’s biggest and most influential companies, has quietly lobbied against the legislation, according to people familiar with its efforts. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:26 pm
The Board conducted the likelihood of confusion analysis according to the thirteen factors set forth in the case In re E.I. du Pont Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1973). [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
Du Pont de Nemours and Company and its subsidiary Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. [read post]
9 May 2014, 2:27 pm
In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973). [read post]
