Search for: "EASTERN EXPRESS v. UNITED STATES" Results 261 - 280 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2012, 6:13 am by Bexis
  Joe represents one of the successful moving defendants in the very recent decision that's described below.Take it away Joe:*****************On January 30, 2012, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of Sandoz Inc., APP Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., and Hospira, Inc. with respect to all remaining plaintiffs in the generic pamidronate… [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:11 pm by Chris
” A recent case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia evaluated whether community associations were exempt from filing requirements. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHIAVELLI; 08-CV-931 (NGG)(JO);  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
ABlawg.caEighty Percent Of Success Is Showing Up: Or “How A Pro Se Farmer Won A Default Against The United States In His Suit To Invalidate The Permit For Half Of Keystone Xl (& Why It Probably Won’t Last)”Case commented on: Bishop v Bostick, 9:13-cv-00082, (E.D. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 7:49 pm
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer's settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 11:21 am
Zeran first filed suit on January 4, 1996, against radio station KRXO in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The SOE does not easily fit within the classical division of obligation, expressed in political and legal theory, between public and private entities, and their respective relationship to law.[3] States have a duty which is undertaken through law;[4] enterprises have a responsibility which is embedded in their governance.[5] These fundamental divisions form part of the current international efforts to institutionalize human rights related norms on and through states and… [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Jack Pringle
"Two cases from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina have addressed the community of interest privilege and applied the 4th Circuit's understanding of the privilege:  Duplan Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:05 am
  Plaintiffs, twelve Wisconsin franchisees brought an action under the Sherman Act, RICO, the Wisconsin Anti-Trust Act, and other Wisconsin consumer protection laws in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, alleging, inter alia, that Quizno's "fraudulently induced plaintiffs and the Class to purchase franchises and thereafter exploited their control and economic power in order to extract exorbitant and unjustifiable… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
  Regards, Roy] Introduction On January 11, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued what commentators have hailed as a “sweeping” decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 5:25 am
  In paragraph after paragraph, the state's highest court repeatedly expressed its reluctance to ascribe "value" to a corpse. [read post]