Search for: "Earl v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 10:00 am by Adam Gillette
 Finally, this post would be insufficiently snarky if it did not point out that the last time Virginia decided to engage in armed revolution against the United State did not achieve the result that Virginia wanted. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:17 am by Dan Markel
Sawyer,[1] to have helped ensure submission of the United States’ amicus brief in Brown v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I think it does become part of the political -- you would then have the Citizens United decision, the Bush v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
One such example is [The Public Papers of Chief Justice Earl Warren (1959, 1966) edited by Henry M. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm by Joe Palazzolo
It begins with the memorable scene in the 2010 address where Justice Samuel Alito mouthed the words “not true,” after President Obama ripped the court for its decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. 1st District.Criminal law -- Counsel -- Waiver -- Failure to conduct proper Faretta inquiry at sentencing hearing -- Remand for resentencing following proper inquiryWILLIAM EARL DUNCAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:08 pm by Stuart Benjamin
Hartlage, the United States Supreme Court confronted a state statute very similar to § 599. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
  These include useful treatments of individual trials, such as Valerie Hebert’s study of the High Command case, Hitler’s Generals on Trial, and Hilary Earl’s The Nuremberg SS-Einsatzgruppen Trial, 1945-1958. [read post]