Search for: "Economou v. Little"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2022, 10:11 am
Supreme Court has posted online the transcript and audio of yesterday’s oral argument in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 9:31 pm
In Vernor v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 8:00 am
McCoy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:15 am
We are discussing Portnoy v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 9:53 am
One might just as well say that an Ex Post Facto Clause argument is reminiscent of Roe v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:05 am
Sadly, the Kelo takings failed to produce the promised “economic development” that supposedly justified them. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 11:44 am
But economic reality is far more rational these days. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 6:24 pm
Calculation of reasonable notice in employment law is one of those peculiarities where very little is definitive. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Slagle v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:01 am
In previous posts, such as The Problem with Income Tax Vehicle Credits, Congressional Mis-delegation Endangers Tax Collections, and More Criticism of Non-Tax Tax Credits, and When Tax Credits Aren’t Worth the Trouble, I have shared a variety of reasons that it makes little or no sense to use the tax law as a substitute for direct funding and oversight by the agencies expertised in the area in question.In McGuire v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
Does that doctrine inequitably favor the big guy over the little guy? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
See Sylvester v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
Thus, the appeals court affirmed the district court’s holding that they were employees and not independent contractors (McFeeley v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 6:07 am
There is little room for judicial discretion. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:00 am
Oracle v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Austin [v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
The reasoning behind (as per the judgment in Clibbery v Allan (No 2) [2002] EWCA Civ 45) is that ancillary relief involves the compulsive disclosure of all aspects of a couple’s economic life and is far wider than disclosure in a civil dispute. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:57 pm
But Judge O'Scannlain, who authors the majority opinion, says (C).It's a neat little dispute. [read post]
