Search for: "Edwards v. Price" Results 261 - 280 of 552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
This post will briefly the issues of ‘drug prices’ and ‘access to medicines’ which received the most comments on previous posts. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Among the more important and recent examples are the cases of Binyam Mohamed and Edward Snowden. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:08 am by David DePaolo
"The Hartford, the workers' compensation carrier for defense contractor JT3 on Edwards Airforce Base, lost an appeal before the 2nd District Court of Appeals, which concluded that the undisputed facts in Schultz v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:34 am by S
When considering the level of damages to award the apartment owners for the damp and the mould Edwards-Stuart J said this: “[304]… In the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in West v Ian Finlay & Associates [2014] BLR 324 , the court said that awards of this type should be modest and subject to a maximum of about £3,000 per annum (at current prices). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on King v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Battle Continues between Attorneys and Client over Attorneys’ Failure to Review Documents: In Price Waicukauski & Riley v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:05 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Young v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 11:34 am
Price US$150 (online price from the publisher US$135). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:55 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday morning the Court heard oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am by Jane Chong
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]