Search for: "English v. Stevens" Results 261 - 280 of 385
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
  There's no  other explanation.I was reminded of this the other day when I underwent the dreary ordeal of re-reading Justice Ginsburg's recent opinion in Cunningham v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
 The Supreme Court held in Holder v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:19 am by Jennifer Davis
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [Parhat v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
At an event marking the first anniversary of the “Libel Reform Campaign”, Justice minister Lord McNally said that English libel law is “not fit for purpose”. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
English is a political economist and public policy professor at Georgetown University (English Brief). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977) (same, despite Justice Stevens’ argument in dissent, id. at 317, 321, that obscenity law should only be enforceable through civil remedies); New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm by Sam Murrant
This development is reported more fully by Steven Brocklehurst on BBC News, and a case comment by Robert Brown on legalweek.com. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  There was the first English “right to be forgotten” case and the most high profile case of the year was that brought by Sir Cliff Richard against the BBC. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
Resolved cases included: Chris Magee v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 22/02/2013; Mr Nicholas Thomas v The Independent, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Steven Wolf v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Orhan Bicer v Middleton Guardian, Clause 1, 21/02/2013; Mr Darren Meldrum v The Scottish Sun, Clause 3, 21/02/2013; Mr Simon Sanderson v Daily Mail, Clauses 1, 12, 21/02/2013; Mr William McNee v Daily Record, Clauses 3, 6, 21/02/2013; Mr William… [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 7:35 am
The opinion in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]