Search for: "Entities I-X" Results 261 - 280 of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 10:39 pm
I previously blogged about Twitter's seemingly lax trademark enforcement practices:Lately I've been watching Twitter's brand management, and I'm curious as to whether Twitter has any significant trademark/brand issues brewing. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:47 am by Carrie Cordero
These are some potential reactions by private sector entities whose existence and success depends not on the government, but on its investors, customers, owners and users. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
NOW, THEREFORE, I, SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS, acting under the authority vested in me as the Governor of the State of Arkansas, do hereby order the following: That all state offices, departments, and agencies, unless granted an exemption by the Governor, shall review official documents of their respective entities regarding the use of the term "Latinx," "latinx," "Latinxs," or "latinxs" in official state documents. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 3:18 pm
I bolded these last two because they are particularly important. [read post]
” In a thread of posts on X (formerly known as Twitter), Wiener asserted that “[w]hile traditional treatment works for many, it doesn’t work for everyone & access is still limited. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 1:15 pm by Bowen "Bo" Ranney
  As a former examiner-in-charge at the CFPB, I can assure you that highlights such as this distill findings from dozens of exams and can provide significant insight into the priorities and likely future supervisory focus of the Bureau. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 10:39 am
I only hope that my opposing counsel do not read (this book) and adopt Terry's methods too. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
  As a result the Court found that “[b]ecause they were never issued a notice of any such violations, MRA and the Association could not have violated §11-135(a)(4)(x). [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:43 pm by Erik J. Heels
In 2012, it is reasonable to assume that if a customer buys a product from BRAND-X, then the customer can return the product to BRAND-X, online or in person. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 4:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
I think the answer to that question is pretty clearly yes. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:38 pm by Ilya Somin
For those keeping score on matters of ideological and jurisprudential consistency, I refer you to the relevant part of my September 2023 post about these cases: I consistently opposed the Texas and Florida laws both before and after Elon Musk acquired Twitter (now called X). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:54 am
 I would urge any state legislature that is considering enacting the Chemerinsky/Sample proposal to include in it a "fallback provision" of the following form: In the event that a court holds the contribution and/or expenditure limits of this Act unconstitutional, any judge whose judicial election campaign was aided by any person or entity that made contributions or independent expenditures in excess of the foregoing limits shall be recused from sitting on any case… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 12:06 pm by Steve Bainbridge
When they printed material or conducted correspondence, it was usually in the name of the "President, Directors, and Shareholders of the X Company. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:28 am by Daniel Shaviro
There is broad agreement about a lot of things - for example, that the tax rules should not distort debt versus equity choices, or the use of a corporate versus a non-corporate entity. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 8:45 am by Dan Harris
, I wrote about foreign companies that had been duped into believing that their IP or their Chinese legal entity (typically either a WFOE or a Joint Venture (JV)) had been registered in China when, in fact, no such registration had been made. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 There is a fundamental difference between the credibility of someone who receives funding from source X, on the one hand, and the agent or employee of source X, on the other. [read post]