Search for: "Episcopal Church Cases"
Results 261 - 280
of 583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
As the story points out, religious claimants don’t always win, but employers must litigate the cases, and more cases are being brought. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:14 pm
The Episcopal Diocese of Quincy had already merged into the Episcopal Diocese of Chicago by the time the judgment was entered, so the only adverse party left before the court was the Episcopal Church (USA), represented by the Presiding Bishop's Chancellor, David Booth Beers, and by her Special Assistant for Litigation, Mary Kostel, as well as by local counsel Thomas B. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:23 am
Just how does the Supreme Court's adoption of "neutral principles" infringe on the ability of the Episcopal Church (USA) to practice the Christian religion? [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
Who is the successor, under Illinois secular law, to the property and rights formerly held by its Episcopal Diocese of Quincy? [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:22 am
Her only diocesan authority is over the Convocation of Episcopal Churches in Europe, which is not a true diocese, since it overlaps with other Anglican provinces. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:06 pm
That may be the way for Calvin and Hobbes to run their exclusive club, but it is not the way to run a church governed by a Constitution and Canons. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:09 am
Episcopal Church. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:31 am
So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
The Episcopal Church, (TX Sup. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, ET AL., No. 11-0265 Opinion of the Court Dissenting Applying its decision today in ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER... v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:51 am
The Episcopal Church, et al.; and No. 11-0332, Masterson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Lawrence, (D SC, Aug. 23, 2013), a South Carolina federal district court declined to exercise jurisdiction over a trademark infringement case growing out of the ongoing controversy between a large break-away portion of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina and the smaller number of parishes that remain loyal to The Episcopal Church. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:52 pm
Weston Houck of the Federal District Court in the District of South Carolina entered an order dismissing "without prejudice" the federal trademark infringement lawsuit filed in that court by Provisional Bishop vonRosenberg of the "Episcopal Church in South Carolina" against Bishop Mark Lawrence of the independent Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:41 pm
The Episcopal Church (USA) and its remnant group in South Carolina, ECSC, are hanging on to a federal trademark infringement lawsuit by their fingernails. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 8:55 am
The Episcopal Church is experiencing that; the Anglican church is experiencing that. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
As a result, Plaintiffs contend Defendants are now improperly precluding members of the Episcopal Church from exercising control over parish property.They relied upon the same California cases, too: cases from Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego Counties in which the departing parishes, unlike those in San Joaquin, did not have the permission of their bishop to disaffiliate. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:10 am
The Episcopal Church through its state affiliate, removed the case to federal court claiming that the case raises federal questions under the 1st Amendment and the Lanham Act. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Protestant Episcopal Church, 685 S.E.2d 163, 171 (S.C. 2009), under which the nature of the polity of ECUSA is irrelevant; and (3) Judge Houck himself recognizes in his own opinion that South Carolina courts are free so to proceed under the law as declared in Jones v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness, 12-1077 – comes to us from the highest state in the nation, where the Colorado Supreme Court (with two dissenting votes) refused to hear two protestors’ challenge to an injunction barring them from (1) displaying “gruesome images” of aborted fetuses and (2) “disturbing worship,” after having picketed on Easter Sunday outside a progressive Episcopal church whose message, “[T]here will be… [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:48 pm
Now, back in April of 2008, you signed a document entitled "The Bishop's Statement on the Polity of the Episcopal Church." [read post]
