Search for: "Escobar " Results 261 - 280 of 572
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2016, 11:25 am by John A. Gallagher
 But, it was 69 more views then I had when I was watching Pablo Escobar carrying out yet another heinous act of greed and cruelty.So, there is that....Okay, now on to that yard work (sigh!). [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 1:40 pm by CJLF Staff
  Court records show Escobar was first held on bond for a May 2009 incident, for which he plead guilty in January 2010. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:00 am by Stephanie Leutert
They aren’t even Pablo Escobar-style traffickers. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 10:47 am by Stephanie Leutert
That is, we may be deferring to images of cartel shootouts and Pablo Escobar-style criminal groups to explain away the current violence as familiar. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Escobar] Tags: Antonin Scalia, qui tam, retroactive, Supreme Court, terrorism Supreme Court roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
Continue Reading The post The Escobar Decision: Whistleblowers’ Law Firm Applauds a Major Ruling from the Supreme Court Interpreting the False Claims Act appeared first on San Francisco Injury Lawyer Blog. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:19 am by The Health Law Partners
Escobar, the court ruled that companies are subject to False Claims Act liability and the implied certification theory, but only if: (1) claims from healthcare providers request payment and make “specific representations about the goods or services provided” and (2) an organization’s failure to disclose noncompliance with “material” requirements would equate to “misleading half-truths. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am by Amy Howe
Escobar, as “an unvarnished victory for government prosecutors, taxpayers, and the qui tam relators who file lawsuits on their behalf under the venerable False Claims Act (FCA). [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am by Amy Howe
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, although “both parties quickly claimed victory, in reality the decision is likely to satisfy no one and to raise as many questions as it answers”; Richard Samp, who at the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse concludes that,… [read post]