Search for: "FLOWERS v. THE STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 10:26 am
However, it also emphasised that, even though the legalisation of cannabis for therapeutic and recreational purposes is under discussion across the EU, the consumption and use of cannabis containing THC above a stated threshold remains illegal in most EU Member States. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 4:03 am
At Legal Insurrection, Cody Wisniewski reluctantly predicts based on the oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court issued a powerful decision in Flowers v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Session 2: Legal Protection for DesignIntroduction: Chris Sprigman: what kinds of protection should be available depends on what the justifications for protection are. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:03 am
Standing Bear, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:41 am
In an op-ed at Law360 (subscription required), Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 3:00 pm
Judge Carlos Bea United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
The petitions of the week are below the jump: Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 5:42 am
Here is the abstract: The case of Flowers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am
Facebook is unhappy about the CJEU’s recent decision in Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Ltd (C 18/18), which held that the social media company could be ordered by member states to remove equivalent content, worldwide when content is deemed illegal in a member state. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 5:27 am
Declining to stay execution of the judgment and/or to set aside the judgment, a federal magistrate judge in New York stated that circuits have made clear that the Supreme Court’s 2002 decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:14 am
That decision, Thomson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:14 am
That decision, Thomson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 3:54 am
At National Review’s Bench Memos blog, Kristen Waggoner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 5:40 am
In Town of Flower Mound v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 4:05 am
Supreme Court yesterday in Arlene's Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 1:59 pm
The case is Spittler v. [read post]