Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 18,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2021, 7:32 am
” In Brockhouse v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 6:07 am
That decision, Harris v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
In Janus v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:14 pm
The decision is McPeters v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:27 am
The decision is McPeters v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
He then stated that it was for this reason self-represented litigants were generally not entitled to costs. [2] 1465778 Ontario Inc. v. 1122077 Ontario Ltd., 2006 CanLII 35819 (ON CA) [3] Dabbs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
In James v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:49 am
The case is Morris Branson Theatre v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:49 am
The case is Morris Branson Theatre v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:40 am
Here, it seems that the arbitrators took a good look at the dispute, which ended up as a written retainer agreement v. hearsay and contradictory oral testimony. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:17 am
§ 1988: In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, * * * the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs * * *The case is Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:33 pm
In Shoner v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:55 am
In Perlaky v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:55 am
First State Bank of Deanville, 747 S.W.2d 783, 785 (Tex. 1988)); Pitts & Collard, L.L.P. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
The statute that created the Sexually Oriented Business fee very specifically states that the Fee should be allocated to programs OTHER than public schools. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:55 am
See Stewart v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:09 am
Attorney General, State of […]Eric Tsai [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:53 am
A copy of the opinion in Sese v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
"A "substantially prevailing" party in a CPLR Article 78 involving New York State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] may claim "attorneys' fee and costs" where the information demanded was withheld by the custodian of the records and the party seeking the information was required to seek judicial assistance to obtain the documents or records demanded. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
A "substantially prevailing" party in a CPLR Article 78 involving New York State's Freedom of Information Law may claim "attorneys' fee and costs" where the information demanded was withheld by the custodian of the records and the party seeking the information was required to seek judicial assistance to obtain them. [read post]
