Search for: "Fisher v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Solicitor General, will argue for the United States as amicus. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Maryland”) shines a spotlight on the second, broader reading of the “Let the end be legitimate” passage, focusing on what happened to its robust conception of implied powers during five key episodes of the early Republic:(1) The Virginia Ratifying Convention (1788);(2) Congressional debates over constitutional amendments (1789);(3) Congressional debates over abolition petitions (1790);(4) Congressional debates over a national bank (1791); and(5) United States… [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 10:45 am by Jon Sands
[Ed. note -- Jon asked me to step in for a few days while he's tending to other business.]United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 4:38 am by SHG
Two cases whose names may well be connected to one of the most important rulings the Supreme Court will make in our lifetime are United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
For example, you can receive alerts on the highly anticipated affirmative action case Fisher v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
United States for this blog, with other coverage coming from Ben Einhouse and Victor Pinedo at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 6:35 am by Marty Lederman
United States), six years into her tenure, Justice Kagan been very careful to recuse herself from any cases in which she was involved as Solicitor General--from all cases on which she worked or was the supervising attorney. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:40 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]