Search for: "Fordham v. Fordham" Results 261 - 280 of 966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2017, 12:23 pm by Bill Otis
 After legislative revisions in the states, it was re-instituted in 1976 by a 7-2 vote in Gregg v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55:  Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative… [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 2:19 pm
Because there is so little scholarly commentary out there on the constitutionality of the lethal injection protocol at issue in Baze v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by axd10
Fordham Law Review, Forthcoming, Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2010-24. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
Former Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson is, at this hour, giving this speech at Fordham Law School in New York: Keynote address at the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School:  A “Drone Court”: Some Pros and Cons by Jeh Charles Johnson[1] March 18, 2013 [preliminary extemporaneous remarks] Thank you for this invitation. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:05 am by Dennis Crouch
Recent cases of interest include Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 5:48 am by Kenneth Anderson
Andrew Kent (Fordham University School of Law) has posted a new paper to SSRN, “Judicial Review for Enemy Fighters: The Court’s Fateful Turn in Ex Parte Quirin, the Nazi Saboteur Case. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:30 pm
And yet today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in Baze v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:41 am by David Colapinto
  The full ARB is considering whether an earlier 2-to-1 ARB panel decision in Fordham v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:13 am by Beck/Herrmann
Professor Ben Zipursky (Fordham) just published a guest post over at Torts Prof Blog ruminating about why the Supreme Court found preemption in the context of medical devices that had undergone premarket approval in Riegel v. [read post]