Search for: "Foster v City of New York"
Results 261 - 280
of 337
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
Information Policy and InfrastructureInscribed on the main post office in New York City there is a famous motto: "Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 5:10 pm
Good Therapist: There's a Role for Both to Play - Twin Cities attorney Jason Brown on his Minnesota Divorce & Family Law Blog Is the anti-SLAPP Statute Being Abused? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 am
”A similar issue was considered by New York State's Court of Appeals in Longwood Cent. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
The Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, USA Today, the Associated Press, the Crime & Consequences blog, and PoliceOne have additional coverage of the argument in King. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
” NPR, SCOTUSblog, the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, Fox News, the Associated Press (via NPR), the ABA Journal, USA Today’s On Deadline blog, Bloomberg (also here), and JURIST provide more detail on the case. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
Foster v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:48 pm
State of New York, the plaintiffs challenged appropriations of state funds to an agency and two public benefit corporations where the funds were to be distributed to private entities to “foster[] economic development. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
" However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for… [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
However the Court concluded that: "allowing the plaintiffs to use municipal funds, labor, and equipment for the nightly menorah lighting, even if the plaintiffs repaid the City for such labor and equipment, as required under the stipulation, would foster the perception of an unconstitutional excessive governmental entanglement with religion (see Walz v Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 US 664, 674; Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church &… [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:05 am
The first, “Defamation on Facebook: Why a New York Court Dismissed a Recent Suit” deals with the recent New York case of Finkel v Dauber. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 5:04 am
In Chabad of Mid-Hudson Valley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:39 am
Morgan Stanley DW, Inc., the Washington State Supreme Court held that state statute of limitations did not apply to a contractual arbitration.New York - New York Department of Labor issues another round of substantially revised WARN regulationsOgletree DeakinsOn July 9, the New York Department of Labor published another substantially revised Notice of Emergency Adoption and Proposed Rule Making under the state Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
David Paterson to remove the term "mental retardation" from the title of the New York’s agency “Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities” and from anywhere in the state statutes and regulations. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:59 pm
Suing New York municipalities (its Counties, Cities, School Districts, Villages, Towns and other local governmental units) is tough to do. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:51 am
Hope that was funded by the Rajah and not by Rajasthan [In 1975], Gotham was bailed out by New York State and the federal government. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Foster (Oklahoma)Capitol v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
Jason Dempsey, Jefferson City, MO. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:37 am
” In Brooks v State of New York, NY2d, the Court of Claims considered a case involving alleged libel brought by an employee of one State agency against the State because of the allegedly disparaging statements made about him by the employee of another State agency. [read post]
