Search for: "Fox v. FCC"
Results 261 - 280
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2010, 6:12 am
Interestingly, and seemingly erroneously, the major advocacy theme of the report is criticism of the "grossly deficient" Second Circuit ruling in Fox Television v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 6:12 am
Interestingly, and seemingly erroneously, the major advocacy theme of the report is criticism of the "grossly deficient" Second Circuit ruling in Fox Television v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
FCC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
FCC, Santiago v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
FCC, Santiago v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:53 am
The Act reinstates the FCC’s prior video description rules adopted in 2000 and subsequently struck down by the Court of Appeals in the case of MPAA v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:29 am
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday.1: No, You Don’t Own It: Court Upholds EULAs, Threatens Digital ResaleFirst off today, in the case of Vernor v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:42 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the appellate court's July decision that the FCC indecency policy was unconstitutionally vague and violative of the First Amendment (See "TUOL" post 7/13/10).The case, Fox Television v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 6:00 pm
Nafal v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978) is outdated.The case is Fox Television v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:53 am
FCC decision from the Second Circuit, page B1: “The decision, which many constitutional scholars expect to be appealed to the Supreme Court, stems from a challenge by Fox, CBS and other broadcasters to the FCC’s decision in 2004 . . . [read post]
Further Analysis on the 2nd Circuit Decision to Invalidate the FCC's Policy on "Indecent" Broadcasts
16 Jul 2010, 10:57 am
DWT's First Amendment experts have now taken a closer look at the Court's decision in Fox Television Stations v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:12 am
Following Tuesday’s Second Circuit decision in Fox v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 6:08 am
(David Post) A random walk through yesterday’s NY Times pulled up the following: In a story about the Fox v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:30 am
" Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 12:50 am
In Fox Television, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:28 pm
Anyway, over to the wonderful world of the FCC, where the decision in FCC v Fox (PDF) does appear to have something very important to say about broadcast regulation and the ongoing life of the 1978 Pacifica decision, FCC v Pacifica 438 US 726, about those seven words mentioned in the introduction to this post. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:00 pm
Fox, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:16 pm
Mary Minow: What inspired you to join the brief in the case of Fox Television et al v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 4:42 pm
In one of the more talked-about stories of the day, we have news that the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit struck down the FCC's indecency rules. [read post]
