Search for: "Frye v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
As stated by the Court of Appeals in Alejandro, this third requirement is also known as the prima facie case requirement. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:07 am
However, more recently, Florida adopted the standard advanced in Frye v. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am
" United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Ryan affects the right to counsel during the state collateral appeal process, while Lafler v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am
Frye, 10–444. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:40 am
Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 10:30 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:54 pm
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:12 am
State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 4:13 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Justice Voigt respectfully dissented.Case Name: EDWARD VENARD v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:03 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Frye, Martinez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:05 pm
The appellate court disagreed, finding that the defense expert's methodology, using a computer-based mathematical model to evaluate the delivery, did not meet the requirements of Frye v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm
In agreeing to hear state officials’ appeals in Lafler v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Frye and State Farm, Dauphin, 2008 CV 17687 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:56 am
Frye v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:54 am
In criminal and motor vehicle cases, however, this state still uses the Frye standard, named for a 1923 federal appellate court decision. [read post]
