Search for: "GRANT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES" Results 261 - 280 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
 It empowers consumers to transfer their digital data to different service providers. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since "[a]s a condition of the receipt of Federal program funding, State Medicaid plans must conform with the statutory standards established by Federal law and the regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the corresponding New York regulation, 18 NYCRR 360-4.9, entitled "Post-Eligibility Utilization of Income," mirrors the federal regulation, and consequently provides as follows: “For a person in permanent… [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Dep’t of Health & Human Services 15-543Issue: (1) Whether the Affordable Care Act’s tax on going without health insurance is a “Bill[] for raising Revenue” to which the Origination Clause applies; and (2) whether the Senate's gut-and-replace procedure was a constitutionally valid “amend [ment]” pursuant to the Origination Clause. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) now accepts that long periods in segregation are not conducive to prisoner health or correctional goals—these facts are not in dispute. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
  The Final RegulationsThis past Tuesday the government published in the Federal Register a series of final rules issued a few days earlier by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and Treasury. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Paranoia About the Internal Revenue Service In a recent three-part series of Verdict columns (here, here, and here), I described the decades-long effort on the part of the Republican Party to demonize the Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 7:23 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Court will, however, order a preliminary injunction to require Defendants Sylvia Matthews Burwell, Yvette Roubideaux, John Hubbard, Jr., and Frank Dayish (collectively, “the Defendants”), to fund the Navajo Health Foundation—Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc., according to the terms of: (i) the Annual Funding Agreement Between Navajo Health Foundation /Sage Memorial Hospital and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Supreme Court Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa case. * Regulatory Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/regulatory/2015fr.htmlWe feature a notice from the Department of Health and Human Services regarding grant opportunites under the Tribal Management Grant program for Indian Health Services. * U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  Both President Obama and his top health policy aide, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia M. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Exchange provision, he continued, makes States mere “subdivisions of the federal government” because it “requires states to establish these exchanges or says that the Secretary of Health and Human Services will step in and do it for them. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, heard 22 and 23 July 2014. [read post]