Search for: "Garland v. Dai"
Results 261 - 280
of 479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Third, all Supreme Court nominations are controversial these days, and this one is no exception. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
Third, all Supreme Court nominations are controversial these days, and this one is no exception. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
” At the ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma looks at Turner v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 6:22 am
NLRB and Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
The 2-1 decision approving the injunction was affirmed when the Supreme Court, minus Justice Scalia (and also minus Merrick Garland), deadlocked 4-4. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 7:22 am
Lynch (10th Cir. 2015) and Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
The Republicans’ strategy seems likely to prove successful; if so, it will have thwarted the general shift to the left by the court that almost certainly would have occurred if Obama’s nominee, Judge Merrick Garland of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
"And you don't see this every day: three justices, three separate decisions. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” Amy Howe covers the expiration of Garland’s nomination for this blog. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:38 am
At Casetext, David Boyle considers how the court’s 2015 opinion in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
And a recess lasting less than 10 days is presumptively too short as well. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 5:07 am
” At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman discusses Water Splash v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 4:01 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Gordon v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Tony Francois highlights Foster v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:25 am
” At Politico, Josh Gerstein reports that Garland “is going back to his day job hearing cases as chief judge of the D.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:12 am
Circuit,’” “the president appeared to concede that Garland, who has been waiting 247 days for a Senate hearing on his nomination, won’t get to sit on the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 10:32 pm
In Petrella v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court requested supplemental briefing in Jennings v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
The only voters who seemed to care about the Supreme Court were the conservatives who want to see Roe v. [read post]
