Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 2,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2008, 7:11 pm
  United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT____________No. 07-5127 September Term 200806cv00217Filed On: November 17, 2008 Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead andWatts, LLP,Appellants v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:18 am by Kent Scheidegger
It was just weeks ago that he was lambasting Gonzalo Curiel, the United States District Court judge overseeing a case against Trump University, saying that as a "Mexican," the Indiana-born judge could not be impartial.All of which makes it only more baffling that Justice Ginsburg would choose to descend toward his level and call her own commitment to impartiality into question. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:37 am by Rick Garnett
However, given the votes of Justices Breyer and Ginsburg in Locke v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
RBG
29 May 2018, 1:21 pm by Harold O'Grady
Through Ginsburg’s history you can track the women’s movement in the United States:  her fight for legal equality (for women and men), her position on an increasingly conservative court. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 7:03 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 17-6086, and issued an opinion in which Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by David Gans
EMA, concerning the constitutionality of state regulation of violent video games, and McComish v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm by Holly Brezee
Asbill  On July 9th, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGirt v. [read post]
5 May 2006, 7:32 am
The United States Supreme Court, in a 9-0 opinion written by Justice Ginsburg, decided the scope and applicability of the probate exception to federal jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]