Search for: "Givens v. Clarke" Results 261 - 280 of 1,332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Barry Sookman
It is being used by the largest organizations such as by way of example only social media giants Google, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter, Alibaba, and Baidu online and offline retailers such as Amazon and Walmart luxury brands like Apple, Burberry, and Louis Vuitton producers of consumer products such as Kimberly-Clark, Unilver, Coca-Cola foodservices providers such as Dominos Pizza, Starbucks, and McDonalds, healthcare providers such as Google, IBM, Elsevier, Tencent entertainment… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings The Maryland General Assembly is on the verge of adopting a vaguely worded, legally dubious tax on digital advertising in the final days of this session—now paired with new tobacco taxes. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
Moreover, in the UK, (in direct contradistinction from the Innsbruck decision) the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) (which I discuss briefly here) held that plaintiffs can recover damages for loss of control of their data without proving pecuniary loss or distress. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 7:07 pm by Michael Douglas
There is a helpful passage at [89] ff: Recognition is a distinct and necessarily prior step to enforcement, but recognition and enforcement are closely linked: Briggs A, The Conflict of Laws (3rd ed, Oxford University Press, Clarendon Series, 2013) 140-141; Clarke v Fennoscandia Ltd [2007] UKHL 56; 2008 SC (HL) 122 at [18]-[23]. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:32 am
However following the judgment of Master Clark in November 2018, the application was dismissed and permission was given to the Defendants to amend their defences.The present case therefore addressed the following questions:Whether, within the meaning of Article 9(2)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), the disputed Big Horn mark was at least similar to the Red Bull trade marks, was used on similar goods, and gave rise to a likelihood of confusion;Whether, within the meaning… [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Cummins is the managing partner of the Clarks Summit, PA law firm of Cummins Law. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Clark, 2019 ONCA 311 (38687) Police sue AG in negligence and misfeasance in public office. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:57 am by Brian Cordery
For the reasons given above, HHJ Clarke was satisfied that the skilled person would not have concluded that the openable closure was an essential requirement of the invention. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by News Desk
Silliker Lecturer is selected by a committee including a representative from Merieux NutriSciences, the Program Committee Chairperson, and the IAFP President.2019 Recipient: Robert V. [read post]