Search for: "Good Shot v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2015, 5:12 am
Graham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:22 pm
As 50 U.S special operations forces arrive in Syria to support opposition groups, the United States continues to pursue “a cease-fire to limit the cycle of killing and the establishment of a timeline for a transition of power. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm
Because getting shot by the cops — whether by tasers or guns — is just something I’ve come to expect in the United States of Amerika. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:22 am
Annex I include a definition of foreign subsidy which largely mimics WTO language but also include interesting additions coming from EU state aid law: ‘Foreign subsidies’ would cover both the goods and services sector and would fall under a future new EU legislation only insofar as they ‘directly or indirectly cause distortions within the internal market’ – reads the Annex. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 9:08 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:21 am
It means there is a good shot the Third Circuit (my "home circuit") will take a swing at this thing. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the motion. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
United State ex rel. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:56 am
The not-so-good case, which just turned up the other day, is Stanley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:00 am
And what should the United States be doing about it? [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:59 am
United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:44 pm
Do SEE ‘N SAY and THE FARMER SAYS really meet the statutory definition of being “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner”? [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm
United States 23-310Issue: Whether the administrative law principles articulated in Kisor v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:27 pm
United States, 517 U. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am
But, as the battle for Tikrit ramps up, the Wall Street Journal reports that the United States is walking back its plan to retake Mosul in April. [read post]
4 May 2015, 10:23 pm
The case is Glossip v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:32 pm
See McKellar v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 pm
But the maker had has registered the label/mark with the United States Patent and Trademark office. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
