Search for: "Grant v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 261 - 280
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
FTC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
’: (LawFont.com)BrazilElectronic copies of oppositions now available on internet: (International Law Office)CanadaSam Trosow on latest CMEC copyright bulletins: (Michael Geist),ComputerWorld Canada on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Deemed abandonment provisions pose traps for the unwary: (International Law Office),Trade mark appeals: stays and service requirements: (Canadian Trademark Blog),Franchising into Canada: (IP finance),More Champagne, anyone? [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’… [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
’ international obligation to implement the “making available right. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
For example, in Dana v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
The new chief of the Antitrust Division, Christine Varney, today published an advance text of a speech she gave yesterday at the Center for American Progress. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 3:40 am
" This morning the Court of Justice gave its ruling in Joined Cases C 446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd, Röhlig Belgium NV and Nokia Corporation and and C 495/09 Nokia Corporation v Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Revenue and Customs, International Trademark Association intervening. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
She also represented televangelists Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker in a case stemming from their settlement of claims by the Internal Revenue Service that they owed taxes. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
For example, in VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Soon after World War I, a committee of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws started work on a model statute. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
Internal Revenue Service is a good example of this approach. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Commissioner, 74 Mass. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
Commissioner, 74 Mass. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Examples of such obligations include the privacy and data security rules of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, federal and state consumer debt and information, electronic crime, data security and identity theft statutes; federal and state trade secret and intellectual property laws; and others, for which violations often equal or substantially exceed the civil monetary penalty liability that commonly arise… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
To make a challenge, the taxpayer must pay the tax when it is assessed and sue for a refund on the premise that the tax is invalid, or make that same argument (without first paying up) as a defense when the Internal Revenue Service actually takes action to enforce a tax provision. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am
The term Lanham Act means the Act entitled An Act to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes’, approved July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.) [read post]
