Search for: "Grant v. Department of Veterans"
Results 261 - 280
of 553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2017, 6:38 pm
The Ninth Circuit Undercut Anonymous Speech by Applying the Wrong Test The case centers on a federal grand jury in Arizona investigating allegations of fraud by a private contractor working for the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:40 am
The case is known as Parkinson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 9:40 am
The case is known as Parkinson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:32 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:48 am
A service department finding that injury, disease or death was not due to misconduct will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs unless it is patently inconsistent with the facts and the requirements of laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:48 am
A service department finding that injury, disease or death was not due to misconduct will be binding on the Department of Veterans Affairs unless it is patently inconsistent with the facts and the requirements of laws administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:24 am
” The cakeshop and DOJ rely heavily on Hurley v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
Did the Tam Court gloss over the language in Walker v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) missed identifying a cancerous mass in the liver of James Avery Deweese. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard oral argument on January 18, 2017. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
” Indeed, among the Court’s orders on its final day of the term on Monday, in a ruling of the Court in the case of Matthis v Shulkin, Justice Gorsuch dissented from the Court’s decision (here, see pages 28-29) in order to raise his question about the presumption of competence allowed Department of Veterans Affairs medical examiners. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
” Indeed, among the Court’s orders on its final day of the term on Monday, in a ruling of the Court in the case of Matthis v Shulkin, Justice Gorsuch dissented from the Court’s decision (here, see pages 28-29) in order to raise his question about the presumption of competence allowed Department of Veterans Affairs medical examiners. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm
The Federal Circuit applies a presumption that the medical professionals whom the Department of Veterans Affairs uses to evaluate these disabled veterans are competent to provide their opinions on any medical issues, which – veterans argue – then imposes a difficult burden on disabled veterans to show that the examiners are not in fact competent. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
So let’s see what new grants may be in the offing for next Monday. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:30 pm
AB 353 would allow private employers to establish a veterans’ preference policy and uniformly grant a hiring preference to veteran applicants, regardless of when the veteran served. [read post]
12 May 2017, 8:10 am
The district court granted summary judgment for FedEx and he appealed. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
But I suspect that even if a grant is in the offing, this case won’t be the vehicle, at least not yet: The respondent (the United States) waived its right to file a brief in opposition, and the court doesn’t ordinarily grant without at least calling for a response. [read post]
