Search for: "Grant v. Henderson" Results 261 - 280 of 558
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2014, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Millett filed a dissenting opinion (Ward v McDonald, August 12, 2014, Henderson, K). [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
Henderson, 245 Wis.2d 345, 629 N.W.2d 613 (Wisconsin Supreme Court 2001). [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 6:06 pm by Jane Chong
That order was granted in part by the district court but stayed by the D.C. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Facebook fought dragnet-with-gag-order subpoena in NY police/fire disability-fraud case [Mike Masnick, TechDirt] Two lawyers charged in alleged plot to extort millions from wealthy sheik [ABA Journal] Judge declares mistrial, plans new trial date in case of allegedly faulty guardrails [Bloomberg, more, background] Last year Overlawyered made the “Hall of Fame” and from now through Aug. 8 you can nominate other sites for the ABA’s annual Blawg 100 honor; Supreme Court, which… [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 6:33 am
HHJ Hacon refused to grant the order. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 41 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Henderson v Foxworth Investments Limited & Anor [2014] UKSC 41 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:11 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC34944 - Henderson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am by Jeremy
Assuming that Henderson had never transferred the copyright in the 1969 mural, those rights would not have expired, and his VARA rights would still be enforceable for a previously-created work. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:33 am
Harris relied upon Henderson v Henderson to argue that any claims against him personally should have been brought along with the original copyright infringement action against Newzbin. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:24 am
.'Servitude is a registered right a person has over the immovable property of another.Some tenants are led to believe that they are entitled to own the leased property after 30 years.To satisfy a claim for an 'acquisitive prescription' the person must possess or have use over servitude for a continuous period of 30 years, without an express or tacit consent or a contractual obligation.In other words, if an owner allows a person to occupy her property or consents to the use of a piece… [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  On April 28, 2014, the California Supreme Court granted the applications and filed briefs of numerous amici curiae (“friends of the court”) in the “CEQA-in-reverse” case, California Building Industry Association v. [read post]