Search for: "Grant v. Public Works, Dept" Results 261 - 280 of 379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
This won’t be granted automatically…but after a request for parenting time even the most absent parent will eventually have some kind of parenting time granted. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
Co., 273 AD2d 766, 767 [3d Dept 2000]; Medical Facilities, Inc. v Pryke, 172 AD2d 338 [1st Dept 1991] (holding that insurer failed to meet the requirement of Insurance Law § 172 (now § 3407) by providing insured with proof of loss forms filled in with amounts instead of blank forms as required by statute)). [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:46 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court found that the defendant, who was now working as a public school teacher, had an income of $54,000. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Grants Pass, Ore. has more homeless residents than shelter beds, forcing some homeless to sleep in public spaces. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Many V Many, --- N.y.s.2d ----, 2011 Wl 1902259 (N.y.a.d. 2 Dept. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
  A member might also take guidance from the First Department’s decision in Lemle v Lemle, 92 AD3d 494, 497 [1st Dept 2012]. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am by Gene Takagi
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Neighborhood Assistance Corp. of America v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Segovia v Bushnell, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 2150113 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:04 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Supreme Court Holds Agreement Provision Prohibiting Divorce until Apartment Sold Violated Public Policy Governing Divorces in New York           In Filstein v Bromberg, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 1167458 (N.Y.Sup.) the parties were married in 1989. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]