Search for: "Gray v. The State Bar"
Results 261 - 280
of 387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
Microsoft (Patently-O) (Patentology) (IPBiz) (Gray on Claims) CAFC clarifies meaning of ‘exclusive licensee’: WiAV Solutions v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:29 pm
The reasoning, thanks to Justice Blackmun's obiter dictum in Jones v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am
The states, however, are barred from imposing any tax or fee on a tribe for its gambling operations. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Bogart, editor.Chicago : American Bar Association, c2009.AntitrustKF1649 .A76 2010Antitrust counterattack in intellectual property litigation handbook.Chicago, Ill. : American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, c2010.AsiaKM50 .A853 2010Asian legal revivals : lawyers in the shadow of empire / Yves Dezalay and Bryant G. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:51 am
There is no “firearm exception” to the general rule barring investigatory stops and frisks on the sole basis of an anonymous tip. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
Courtesy of Doug Berman over at Sentencing Law and Policy: Gray Proctor and criminal procedure guru, Nancy King, have jointly authored an article entitled Post Padilla: Padilla’s Puzzles for Review in State and Federal Courts. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
(Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Compliance with Court Order requiring election of claims does not bar later assertion of non-elected claims: LML Patent Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:21 am
Comer was the district attorney in Pampa from 1988 to 1992, when he resigned–and was later suspended by the Texas State Bar–after admitting that he improperly borrowed $10,000 from a drug seizure fund. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
Comer was the district attorney in Pampa from 1988 to 1992, when he resigned–and was later suspended by the Texas State Bar–after admitting that he improperly borrowed $10,000 from a drug seizure fund. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:59 am
A recent increase in activity in the United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 7:26 pm
State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
Plaintiff wanted to obtain a red fez, while prison rules permitted only white or gray ones. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Durex) v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
Although there is Court of Appeal dicta to the contrary, (Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] EWCA 331.) it is submitted that this is inconsistent with dicta from the House of Lords decision in Jameel (at [54] and [118]) and that the Privy Council decision should be followed. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
The ECtHR jurisprudence eschews mechanical tests and rigid bars to relief of the type embodied in Bonnard v Perryman. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp (Gray on Claims) District Court E D Texas: Qui tam plaintiff cites Professor Crouch’s question to readers as proof that patent expiration dates are not readily ascertainable: North Texas Patent Group, Inc. v. [read post]
