Search for: "Green v. Franke" Results 261 - 280 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
A few minutes later, we returned to the green tower with the female overseer. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 8:07 pm by Nora Ellingsen
During the Holocaust, we failed to let refugees like Anne Frank into our country. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
: (Innovationpartners), ICANN reforms threaten voice of IP owners: (Managing Intellectual Property), INTA 130th annual meeting – a report: (IPKat), (Intellectual Property Watch), (IAM), INTA’s online Committee Portal premiers: (Managing Intellectual Property), Hans Van Bylen tells how careful brand management and exploitation of ‘glocal’ products helped Henkel become global player: (Managing Intellectual Property), Records number of IP owners applied for… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises  v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
., Defendant-Appellant.JERRY LEIBER, individually and doing business as, JERRY LEIBER MUSIC; MIKE STOLLER and FRANK MUSIC CORP., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NAPSTER, INC., Defendant-Appellant. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]