Search for: "HALLIBURTON COMPANY"
Results 261 - 280
of 820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Halliburton was not. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:02 am
Here is one article from an insurance company explaining rates increases to the point of doubling or tripling. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:02 am
Here is one article from an insurance company explaining rates increases to the point of doubling or tripling. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
There are 3 obvious routes: Have the instructor take attendance Get employees ‘ signatures confirming they have understood training Administer a test after the training, so that employees can demonstrate their understanding Halliburton: U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:03 am
According to Halliburton’s counsel, “[t]he most recent studies by NERA and Stanford show that 75 percent of class certification motions are granted in securities cases; and that number is much, much higher with respect to New York Stock Exchange companies that essentially have no way to dispute market efficiency. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:19 pm
Levinson opinion, but with the injection of the company's ability to inject price impact showings at the class certification stage. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
On June 23, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 12:49 pm
The eagerly awaited decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
(“Halliburton”) and its CEO made a series of public misstatements concerning the company’s liabilities and revenues and the cost savings expected from a recent merger. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
In Halliburton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:55 am
The Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Halliburton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
In Halliburton v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
By Matt Skurnik Yesterday, in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:07 pm
Under the fraud-on-the-market presumption, reliance by investors on a misrepresentation is presumed if the misrepresentation is material and the company’s shares were traded on an efficient market that would have incorporated the information into the stock price. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court decided Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:06 pm
(the “Fund”) purchased stock in Halliburton and lost money when Halliburton’s stock price dropped upon the release of certain negative news regarding the company. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:06 pm
It started like this: Halliburton, a major petroleum services company, made some very powerful statements about asbestos claims that had been filed against it’s companies by people who were injured by asbestos poisoning. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:58 am
Halliburton Co. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
In their complaint, the plaintiffs allege that the company and certain of its directors and offices understated the company’s exposure to asbestos liability and overestimated the benefits of the company’s merger with Dresser Industries. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:34 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Halliburton. [read post]
